Modern Manual Therapy Blog - Manual Therapy, Videos, Neurodynamics, Podcasts, Research Reviews: Achilles Tendinopathy
Showing posts with label Achilles Tendinopathy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Achilles Tendinopathy. Show all posts

In this episode, I talk about a relatively new trial investigating pressure massage versus eccentric exercise for Achilles tendinopathy in a randomised trial. I hope you enjoy!

Also, if you have some time on your hands during this time of isolation and need to catch up on CPD head on over to my online course. The 3rd edition of my online Mastering Lower Limb Tendinopathy course is available for $295.

Via Dr. Peter Malliaras - Tendinopathy Rehab

All of our Eclectic Approach Seminars are 50% off this month for our Work at Home Sale! Save at least $100! Click on the image to save or go to The Eclectic Approach Online






Want an approach that enhances your existing evaluation and treatment? No commercial model gives you THE answer. You need an approach that blends the modern with the old school. 
  • NEW - Online Discussion Group
  • Live cases
  • webinars
  • lecture
  • Live Q&A
  • over 600 videos - hundreds of techniques and more! 
  • Check out MMT Insiders
Keeping it Eclectic...


[ACHILLES TENDINOPATHY REHAB PRINCIPLES] 👣


Originally found on Brad Beer's instagram, reposted with permission.

_
☝🏻When it comes to Achilles tendinopathy the basics as outlined above work 👀
_
👉🏻Great example: recreationally competitive South African Ling course triathlete with 8months of pain & limitation: tried passive modalities-Graston, remedial massage, orthoses, taping & an underloaded set of exercises, fear avoidant of running & wondering if surgery would be required 🤔
_
👉🏻With reduction in speed work & volume 20-30%, and addition of progressive loading program -the triathlete (Gav) is now well on his way 🎽
_
‼️TAKE HOME: if you are struggling with persisting Achilles Tendinopathy consult w a practitioner that can prescribe you a losing program to assist returning the energy storage to the tendon ( & be patient!) 👟

Want to learn in person? Attend a #manualtherapyparty! Check out our course calendar below!

Learn more online!


Online Discussion Group now live! Want an approach that enhances your existing evaluation and treatment? No commercial model gives you THE answer. You need an approach that blends the modern with the old school. Live cases, webinars, lectures, Q&A, hundreds of techniques and more! Check out Modern Manual Therapy!

Keeping it Eclectic...


Firstly, welcome back to "Talking Tendons' in 2019!

Understanding how tendon recovers from injury and adapts to load is so important and has huge implications on how we manage tendons and the education and advice that we provide patients. I am starting off this year's podcast discussing a relatively new study providing insights into the collagen turnover in healthy tendons and those with tendinopathy, adding critical knowledge to what we know about tendon collagen adaptation over time. 

Also wanted to mention a couple of face to face courses I will be presenting in Melbourne and Sydney in the coming months. Firstly in Melbourne on Saturday 18th May followed by Sydney on Saturday 24th August - visit the links below for bookings!

References

1. Heinemeier KM, Schjerling P, Øhlenschlæger TF, Eismark C, Olsen J, Kjær M. Carbon-14 bomb pulse dating shows that tendinopathy is preceded by years of abnormally high collagen turnover. The FASEB Journal. 2018;32(9):4763-75.
2. Heinemeier KM, Schjerling P, Heinemeier J, Magnusson SP, Kjaer M. Lack of tissue renewal in human adult Achilles tendon is revealed by nuclear bomb 14C. The FASEB Journal. 2013;27(5):2074-9.
4. Parkinson J, Samiric T, Ilic MZ, Cook J, Feller JA, Handley CJ. Change in proteoglycan metabolism is a characteristic of human patellar tendinopathy. Arthritis & Rheumatism. 2010;62(10):3028-35.

Keeping it Eclectic...


This week on Talking Tendons we discuss Non-uniform Achilles tendon strain and displacement and tackle the important questions… what is it? And should we care?

The paper is by Prof Finni from Finland supported by an international team. This is an exciting space that has already and will continue to improve our understanding of tendon function and ultimately our ability to prevent and manage these injuries.
Hope you enjoy.
For more episodes, don't forget to subscribe!
If you like this podcast, why not check out my accredited online course, "Mastering Lower Limb Tendinopathy". Click here for more details. 
See you next time,
Changes in Achilles tendon mechanical properties following eccentric heel drop exercise are specific to the free tendon. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25919320
A 3D model of the Achilles tendon to determine the mechanisms underlying nonuniform tendon displacements. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27919416
Nonuniform displacement and strain between the soleus and gastrocnemius subtendons of rat Achilles tendon https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29094399


Want an approach that enhances your existing evaluation and treatment? No commercial model gives you THE answer. You need an approach that blends the modern with the old school. Live cases, webinars, lectures, Q&A, hundreds of techniques and more! Check out Modern Manual Therapy!

Keeping it Eclectic...


If you want more clinical tendon info than is in these blogs, the Mastering Lower Limb Tendinopathy course will be in Melbourne, Perth, Adelaide and Canberra during 2017. 
Interesting study to review this week from Oda et al. Co-authors include Paavo Komi and Masaki Ishikawa who have done lots of work on stretch shorten cycle. In this study they explore muscle-tendon unit functional changes during double leg hopping among people with a prior Achilles tendon rupture. There are implications for rehabilitation, but also insights into how and if pathological tendons adapts to load.

Background: Achilles tendon (AT) rupture is an extreme injury.  If left untreated the person will most likely lack planterflexion for the rest of their lives and walk with a characteristic apropulsive gait with hip external rotation. Thankfully, most people are treated and whether it is surgery or conservative treatment have the potential to have a good outcome. 
Some studies have reported reduced AT stiffness within 2 years of repair (e.g. Wang 2013). Other authors have shown increased tendon stiffness 2-6 years after repair (e.g. Agres 2015). My experience is that certainly beyond 2 years there is lots of fibrosis and thickening and perhaps therefore increased stiffness is not unexpected  at this time. The authors of this study were interested in the neuromechanical behavior of the repaired AT 1-2 years after repair. In particular, whether the tendon is more complaint (less stiff) and how this influences the calf muscle activation, Achilles force and stretch shorten cycle function of the tendon. 
What they did: They recruited people with a unilateral prior AT repair to hop bilaterally and recorded oodles of data. Makes my eyes water reading it. The instruction was to perform bilateral hopping symmetrically for 10 seconds as high as possible. They report that they confirmed subjects did not have fear or pain after the hops. Here is a summary of the neuromechanical measures they took during this task:
  • Ground reaction force – participants stood on a force plate during the task
  • High speed video in the sagittal plane of knee and ankle joint angles
  • Ultrasound video data of movement of the medial gastroc muscle-tendon junction
  • Surface EMG data from tibialis anterior, soleus and medial gastroc. To normalize the EMG they compared ratios including (all relative to ground contact):
    • Pre 100ms/pre 200ms
    • Post 30ms/pre 100ms
    • Short latency stretch reflex (30-70ms post)/post 30ms
    • Breaking (just prior maximum dorsiflexion angle)/pre 100
    • Push-off (just prior maximum dorsiflexion angle)/breaking
  • Fascicle length and pennation angle of the medial gastroc
  • Cross sectional area of the Achilles tendon just under the muscle-tendon junction of soleus
They used an electronic pulse to synchronise the ground reaction forces, high speed video data, ultrasound video data and EMG data. Using all this rich data they were able to calculate the following:
  • Ankle joint moments based on joint angles and ground reaction forces (using inverse dynamics)
  • Change in Achilles tendon length during hopping based on medial gastroc muscle-tendon unit length (from ultrasound data - see figure below) and the change in the entire calf-Achilles muscle tendon unit length (from 2D high speed video data)
  • Achilles tendon force by dividing ankle joint moments by the AT moment arm (given moment = force * moment arm)
  • Achilles stiffness in hop by dividing the peak AT force by change in AT length (given stiffness = force/elongation)
  • Young’s modulus in hop by dividing the peak stress (force/cross sectional area) by strain (elongation/resting length)
  • Plantarflexor power were calculated by multiplying AT force by the stretching velocity (negative power) or shortening velocity (positive power) (given power = force * velocity)
  • Efficiency of AT energy return was determined by dividing the shortening work (area under the force-length curve) by the stretching work
Screen Shot 2017-06-02 at 5.05.50 pm.png
What they found: The previous repaired AT was longer (12%) and had a larger cross sectional area (91% - wow! Almost double the size) than the normal AT. The fascicle length was also shorter (17%) and pennation angle smaller (7%) in the previous repaired AT.
The only kinematic difference between legs was that the prior AT repaired group had more ankle DF at toe-off (6%). Contact time and time to peak AT force were also similar between groups. This suggest that both legs moved in a similar way, which you would expect for a bilateral hopping task.
The key differences between legs were reduced peak AT force on the repaired side (14%), and this leg also had more Achilles stretch or strain in the braking phase (6.8% compared with 4.6% in normal tendon) and less shortening of medial gastroc in propulsive phase. The Achilles stiffness and modulus during the hop were also lower in the repaired AT (makes sense because there was less force going through it yet more elongation). Soleus and tibialis anterior ratios for SLR/post 30ms were lower for the repaired AT yet the braking phase soleus activity was greater. Finally, there was less positive work and less positive to negative work ratio in the repaired AT. The figure below shoes that the force enhancement in the concetraic or propulsive phase is lower for the ruptured versus normal AT (see shaded area in force-velocity curve). 
Screen Shot 2017-06-02 at 5.08.50 pm.png
Clinical implications: These findings indicate that the repaired AT is more compliant and overstretches in the braking phase of hopping (soleus works harder here, possibly because of the increased compliance). Probably as a consequence of greater compliance, the tendon is not able to utilize stored energy for positive work in the propulsive phase (ie the stretch shorten cycle spring mechanisms of the muscle and tendon is affected, ie there is greater hysteresis or energy lost). The authors suggest that a preprogrammed strategy to protect the Achilles is obviously not happening here and that seems sensible given the increased Achilles stretch. It is possible that the increased soleus activation in the braking phase is a compensation for reduced motor output (e.g. maximal voluntary contraction) of this muscle (which was not measured by the authors). 
We don’t know what rehab these people had but I would guess not enough loaded progressive seated and standing calf raises (based on my biased experience seeing these patients). Maybe this would help to restore muscle-tendon function, maybe it would not – we still need to find out. 
A limitation to consider is that they compared unaffected side vs affected, and we know that the unaffected may suffer motor output deficits too to some extent.
So what are the key take home messages?
  • Biomechanics can be scary, but is also beautiful
  • Breaking it down to relatively simple equations hopefully makes it much less scary
  • People with prior Achilles rupture have a MASSIVE Achilles tendon
  • But it does not function very well (ie impaired energy storage and return)
  • It demonstrates that the Achilles tendon is super slow to return to function post repair
  • Whether we can do better than this with super-excellent rehab (what is this?) is not known 
See you next time


Want an approach that enhances your existing evaluation and treatment? No commercial model gives you THE answer. You need an approach that blends the modern with the old school. Live cases, webinars, lectures, Q&A, hundreds of techniques and more! Check out Modern Manual Therapy!

Keeping it Eclectic...





Hi all,
Welcome to tendinopathy blog 48 (subscribe here).
Here’s the latest dates for Mastering Lower Limb Tendinopathy courses 2017 which in Wagga Wagga, Melbourne, Perth, Canberra and finally Adelaide.
The blog this week is super useful for clinicians. How often does a patient with Achilles tendon pain either ask or have concern about rupturing their tendon? I see 5-10 or so Achilles each week and I reckon most are in this category. This paper is tiny but packs a punch for that reason. It will help you convince patients that their risk of rupture is small – now that’s valuable!
Background: Everyone knows someone who has ruptured their Achilles tendon. Not a good injury. Takes months to recover and you need to do lots of rehab to restore calf function from almost zero. To add to that many people have suboptimal outcomes. These days in the clinic I don’t see many acute ruptures for management/rehab, but I see many people 6+ months down the track post Achilles rupture management (both surgical and conservative) who have ’failed’. Most are unable to do a single leg calf raise. There is a road back, but it is long and difficult (I always tell them that at the start, they don’t like it!).  
So understandably, patients who have Achilles pain (and also by the logic above know someone who has previously ruptured their Achilles!) are often scarred to death of rupture. I routinely ask them and find this to be a common fear. Bit of a double-edged sword asking them, as you run the risk of planting the fear in their mind if they were not previously fearful, but you can get around this with good education.
Some of the rupture stats out there are downright scary. For example, the odds of a rupture (on the contralateral side) among someone who has already had a rupture are 176x greater than a rupture occurring in someone who has never had one (Aroen et al 2004). Important to say we are talking about rare events – eg 6% of the previously ruptured group experienced another rupture. Regardless, that is not a stat that fills people who have ruptured an Achilles with great confidence (don’t tell them).
But we are getting of topic. The focus of the featured study was the following question: Doc, is this painful Achilles tendon likely to rupture on me?
The authors reasoned that Achilles tendons that are painful and those that rupture share similar pathology features. So therefore it is conceivable that some painful Achilles tendons may go onto to rupture.
This seminal paper from Kannus gave us some answer to the question of how common rupture is when you have a painful tendon. They showed that only 20% among 891 tendons that spontaneously ruptured were previously painful. They prospectively recruited ruptured tendons that presented for treatment. They also took biopsies from the torn tendon and showed that almost all (about 98%) would have had tendon pathology prior to rupture.
Based on the Kannus study 4 out of 5 tendons that rupture have prior pain. The current paper answers the same questions using different methods.
What they did: Data was extracted from the USA-based PearlDiver Record Database. The dataset includes reported data from hospitals and physicians between 2007 and 2011 and has information on 20,484,172 patients. About 9% of people in the USA under 65 years old are represented. The authors identified (based on diagnostic codes) people with Achilles tendon rupture and Achilles tendinopathy between the ages of 20-69 years. The most interesting outcome was incidence of Achilles rupture among people with prior tendinopathy (ruptures on background of diagnosed painful tendinopathy/number with tendinopathy). The same outcome as the Kannus paper but based on retrospective database data rather than patients presenting prospectively for treatment. 
What they found: The usual stuff about ruptures being most common among men between the ages of 40-49 was reported, blah, blah, blah. The incidence of ruptures was low (about 0.1%) whereas the incidence of Achilles tendinopathy was 10x higher (about 1%). Approximately 4.0% of patients with Achilles tendinopathy subsequently sustained a rupture and this was greatest in the 40-59 year olds (see figure below).
Screen Shot 2017-05-12 at 4.08.43 pm.png
Clinical interpretation: This is the only study that I am aware that investigates whether tendinopathy leads to rupture among a large dataset. The authors conclude that this finding ‘underscores the success of the various treatment modalities specific to Achilles tendinopathy’. I I'm not sure about that, I think the main points are: 
a) Rupture among people with Achilles tendon pain is rare (possibly less common than the 20% reported by Kannus)
b) Rupture and tendinopathy groups are probably different – the reasons for this are debated but may include conscious or unconscious change in motor output secondary to pain, or genetic differences between the groups.
There are major limitations to this retrospective design. First, we cannot be sure the patients were diagnosed accurately and the diagnostic criteria are unclear and may vary between clinicians. Second, it is conceivable that some people who subsequently ruptured did not report this rupture in the current database. Another big issue is not knowing what predisposing factors there may be, eg steroid, fluoroquinolone injection, metabolic factors, etc, that perhaps may have pushed the tendinopathy patients towards rupture. The only one we know about from this paper is age.
To finish with, here is a patient anecdote about the importance in predisposing factors (in this case steroid injection) in Achilles rupture. When working in a tendinopathy clinic in London many years ago I was involved in the management of a 69 yo male with Achilles tendon pain. Long story short, he was administered peri-tendinous steroid after failing initial conservative care (not by me but I was part of the team so had some responsibility). I remember doing a telephone follow up with him a few weeks later and he reported that he was happy with his outcome – he said he felt something go a couple weeks after the injection and had no pain since, but walking was harder. Mistakes will occur, as long as you cop it and learn!
See you next time


Want an approach that enhances your existing evaluation and treatment? No commercial model gives you THE answer. You need an approach that blends the modern with the old school. Live cases, webinars, lectures, Q&A, hundreds of techniques and more! Check out Modern Manual Therapy!

Keeping it Eclectic...